|
NWT Chamber
of Mines
Board of Directors Meeting
October 27, 2000, Chamber Board Room
President Jim Excell in the Chair.
Directors present:
Jim Excell, Rod Brown, Todd McKinlay, Mike Byrne, John McConnell,
Peter Le Mare, Gord Clarke, and Darrell Beaulieu. Eira Thomas and
Bill Danyluk by teleconference.
Call to Order:
Jim Excell called the meeting to order at 1:15 PM.
Minutes of the
Board of Directors Meeting of September 29, 2000 were adopted.
Moved by John McConnell. Seconded by Gord Clark. Carried.
No new business
arising from last minutes.
No formal agenda
was presented. Two matters of business for this meeting:
- Nominating committee results
- Nunavut Chamber of Mines issue
Financial Statements
were not reviewed as they had been considered at the meeting of
September 29.
(1) Nominating
Committee results:
John McConnell, Jim Excell and Peter Le Mare, as the Nominating
Committee, have a proposed slate, which would make a total of 16
board members.
- Henry Murzyn of Nishi-Khon / SNC Lavalin Ltd.,
- Bernadette
Stewart of Braden-Burry Expediting,
- Trevor
Teed, independent prospector,
- Tom Hoefer
of Diavik Diamond Mines.
- Todd McKinlay
has agreed to stay standing as Treasurer. Rod Brown has agreed
to stay standing as secretary. Jim Excell has agreed to stay
standing a President.
- John McConnell
has agreed to step in as Vice-President.
No other nominations
were brought forward at this time.
(2) Nunavut
Chamber of Mines:
Prior to this board meeting, Steven Quinn of Miramar Mining Corporation
presented to Mike Vaydik, a proposal indicating the urgent need
for a Nunavut Chamber of Mines. Two meetings, one in Vancouver and
one in Toronto, were the basis of this proposal which indicates
the need for the mining industry in Nunavut to have proper representation.
Steven Quinn has indicated he has spoken to 30-40 mining companies,
which feel this move is necessary, and needs to be acted upon immediately.
Mr. Quinn joined in the board meeting via telephone conference call
at 2:00pm.
The following
points related to the Nunavut Chamber of Mines proposal were brought
forth at the board meeting:
- The cost of running a Nunavut Chamber of Mines with no affiliation
to the NWT Chamber of Mines is very high. This would involve
hiring and paying at least two individuals and renting space
etc. The figure of $54,000 proposed was felt to be inadequate
to properly fund an office and staff in Nunavut.
- Current
members working in the NWT, who are working in Nunavut as well,
would be asked to pay approximately double the amount in membership
fees.
- The proposal
suggests that the NWT Chamber of Mines receives yearly grants
totaling $70,000 to $80,000. This is not the case. In the past,
the NWT government gave an annual $25,000 grant, but this was
discontinued three years ago. The Chamber now receives no grants
from any source.
- The NWT
Chamber of Mines has recently gone through two very lean years
financially, mainly due to the cyclical nature of the exploration
business. It continues to get by on a very tight budget and
with a minimum of staff. To take on more financial commitments
at this stage would not be sustainable unless new revenue sources
were identified. It has taken many years to become established
and the board recognized the need to move cautiously, at the
same time acknowledging the need to better respond to Nunavut
issues and service requirements.
- The high
cost of travel in Nunavut was recognized as a problem and tended
to make it very costly for members to travel to meetings there.
Bill Danyluk offered to hold some meetings at Lupin Mine. This
would allow the meetings to be held at a Nunavut operating location
at no cost to the members.
- The North
cannot support too many organizations. Concerns were raised
that we might not even be funding the one Chamber of Mines we
have sufficiently to the job we expect of it, without adding
another organization. It would be better to pull together as
one organization that has sufficient resources than split our
efforts at this time. Yellowknife has long been the center of
the northern mining industry and will have to recognize a changing
role with the formation of Nunavut. We need to recognize Nunavut
and build Nunavut ownership and commitment to our industry.
Taking these
points into consideration, how could we approach this proposal?
- Single Chamber with two names, two letterheads, two identities.
- Single Chamber with name recognizing NWT and Nunavut.
- An umbrella organization with 3 territorial components: NWT,
Nunavut and Yukon, Maybe Arctic Chamber of Mines.
The following conclusions were made at the meeting:
- A single Chamber with two identities would not work.
- We should not consider taking the Yukon Chamber of Mines
into our organization as it has different needs at this time.
- A single Chamber recognizing both territories would work,
but would need to take points into consideration that Nunavut
wants an identity of its own. Therefore, it was decided that
a fourth alternative should be considered, in that a Nunavut
caucus of the existing Chamber could be formed to represent
the Nunavut territory mining industry.
- Increase the number of board members, to include more from
Nunavut mining and business organizations, not just the mine
managers. Also, split the current position of vice-president
into vice-president of NWT and vice-president of Nunavut. This
would signify clearly that there was a Nunavut caucus and more
Nunavut representation. The Nunavut V.P. should permanently
reside in Nunavut and would be closely aligned with the industry
and accessible to government. We need to approach an individual
to take on this role.
- Name change to represent both territories. The constitution
was changed at the last Annual General Meeting, in November
1999, to include the territory of Nunavut, but the name of the
organization has not been changed. Proposals for the name change,
including "NWT & Nunavut Chamber of Mines", will
be presented at the meeting to be held at the Nunavut Mining
Symposium in Rankin Inlet and then presented for ratification
at the Annual General Meeting of the NWT Chamber of Mines on
November 23rd, 2000 in Yellowknife.
- Some felt the need to establish a Nunavut address where people
feel they can reach easily, and not have all contact with the
Yellowknife office. Others felt that was not critical at this
time but was a logical outgrowth as funding permits.
- A meeting will be held at the Nunavut Mining Symposium in
Rankin Inlet, to discuss these points and concerns. A conference
call will be set up for those directors who cannot attend in
person. Nunavut members are asked to lobby Nunavut ministers
present at the Symposium to ask for their support and contributions
with respect to forming a Nunavut caucus and particularly for
establishing a physical presence in Nunavut. This information
will be carried over for voting at the AGM in Yellowknife in
November.
Adjournment:
Moved by Mike Byrne. The meeting adjourned at 3:05 PM.
Back
to Views & Report
|